Review topics: ["size","fit","look","price","weight","length","quality","problem","fabric","material","weather","legs","style","feel","packaging","pants","comfy","piece","medium","waistband","dress","hem","trousers","addition","considering","touch","tie","top","oxford","vibe"].
Reviews
Decoloration after a few washes
"The pants are soft and comfortable, and i love the feel. However, after a couple of washes, the pants started losing color. Now they look sun-bleached, and I can't wear them as often. I think the quality of Everlane products is decreasing so bad I'm not buying from them as often."
— Jenvivar (2/5)
Decoloration after a few washes
"The pants are soft and comfortable, and i love the feel. However, after a couple of washes, the pants started losing color. Now they look sun-bleached, and I can't wear them as often. I think the quality of Everlane products is decreasing so bad I'm not buying from them as often."
— Jenvivar (2/5)
Worst back pockets of any garment I've ever owned
"These are comfy, they look nice for ""sweatpants"", but all of the goodness is cancelled out by the horrendous back pockets. They are made of the same material as the pants (instead of a silky slip-like material) so naturally bunch up and look thick and obvious. This material is thick, so why on god's green earth would someone think to use TWO layers of it underneath one layer of it to make a pocket????? Plus, it isn't slippery or the kind of material that glides against other materials, so it just bunches up on itself or against underwear while walking. There is no avoiding this with different kinds of underwear, it is just the stupidest fabric to ever use for a back pocket. I have to cut them out and sew the pocket shut, and considering the price of these pants (and the fact I have to do it for all 3 pairs I own), it's kind of infuriating to have to take the time and effort on my own to make them wearable. I really don't know what anyone was thinking here (was anyone thinking at all???? does anyone even test these items for wearability?!), this is the worst pocket situation of any pants in my 40 years of being alive."
— JB12C34 (2/5)
Dress up or down
"Love these pants. The material is very heavy, but feels quality and lux. Too heavy for summer though. It’s plenty dressy for work, but as comfortable as sweatpants. My only minor complaint is the elastic could have slightly more give… it feels stretched to the max when I pull over my (average-ish) hips, but fine when it’s on my waist. At 5’4” the small size reaches my heel, so no hemming needed."
— Charkey (5/5)
Worst back pockets of any garment I've ever owned
"These are comfy, they look nice for "sweatpants", but all of the goodness is cancelled out by the horrendous back pockets. They are made of the same material as the pants (instead of a silky slip-like material) so naturally bunch up and look thick and obvious. This material is thick, so why on god's green earth would someone think to use TWO layers of it underneath one layer of it to make a pocket????? Plus, it isn't slippery or the kind of material that glides against other materials, so it just bunches up on itself or against underwear while walking. There is no avoiding this with different kinds of underwear, it is just the stupidest fabric to ever use for a back pocket. I have to cut them out and sew the pocket shut, and considering the price of these pants (and the fact I have to do it for all 3 pairs I own), it's kind of infuriating to have to take the time and effort on my own to make them wearable. I really don't know what anyone was thinking here (was anyone thinking at all???? does anyone even test these items for wearability?!), this is the worst pocket situation of any pants in my 40 years of being alive."
— Jb12 C. (2/5)
Dress up or down
"Love these pants. The material is very heavy, but feels quality and lux. Too heavy for summer though. It’s plenty dressy for work, but as comfortable as sweatpants. My only minor complaint is the elastic could have slightly more give… it feels stretched to the max when I pull over my (average-ish) hips, but fine when it’s on my waist. At 5’4” the small size reaches my heel, so no hemming needed."
— Charkey (5/5)
A bit wide
"I bought S and it was a bit too sluggish for my taste. The size chart says i should be exactly size S. The length is perfect tho, and the material is soft and thick. Can't return it because I bought it on sale. Will still be wearing these!"
— BriBriBrina (4/5)
The Perfect Pant
"I have multiple pairs of the Dream Pant and it was a no brainer for me to purchase the wide leg Dream Pant. They're super comfortable and always look good no matter what. I wear them year-round and they're easily the hardest working piece in my wardrobe."
— KimberlyH (5/5)
Quality control
"I had a pair of these from last year that fit well, liked them, and I wear them a lot. Got another pair this season in the same size and they were wider, shorter, had a more fleece-like, cheaper texture, and absolutely reeked of laundry detergent. While super wide, like clownishly wide, in the butt and legs, they fit tighter in the waist. They'd been worn and (not very effectively) washed. Everlane was fine with returns but what a disappointment."
— Jen A. (2/5)
A bit wide
"I bought S and it was a bit too sluggish for my taste. The size chart says i should be exactly size S. The length is perfect tho, and the material is soft and thick. Can't return it because I bought it on sale. Will still be wearing these!"
— Bri B. (4/5)